37 Comments
User's avatar
David Maceira's avatar

He's going to launch lie after lie about election fraud. Meanwhile, he's using ICE murderers to incite a violent response from citizens. In the hopes that it would open the door to the insurrection act. All as a ruse to delay or halt the mid-term elections. Epstein files, the failed war, lost lawsuits. The walls are closing in on him and he is desperate. Stay vigilant! Fight the good fight!!

Jan's avatar
2dEdited

We don't seem to be getting anywhere with our "Good Fight"! If Trump thinks something is going to go against him (prodded by his "advisors") then he will just use an "executive order" to cancel anything going against him. America is in serious trouble right now and still 2 1/2 years to go! Trump came out of the inauguration fighting against America and not remembering ANYTHING that his campaign promised. Of course, he is a certified liar so anyone who voted for him bought into his lies!

David Maceira's avatar

He's weak and desperate. Even members in the GOP and even MAGA are starting to turn against him. Dictators and their cabal always forget that oppression breeds rebellions.

And that there are hundreds of millions of us rebels.

Michael Breen's avatar

No American, especially this felon president and his family, should enjoy lifetime immunity from IRS scrutiny. Unprecedented and what message does this send?

King Donald and another 4th of July?

Jan's avatar

It means that the Trump family (enormously rich) will never have to pay any taxes again! I hope the judge that came down against it, holds on and this ridiculous "settlement" gets tossed out.

Michael Breen's avatar

I totally agree, Jan. This “deal” is everything our country is inherently against: special treatment for an authoritarian leader, wannabe dictator. So many people in this country have made “exceptions” for this miserable man that it baffles my whole belief system in our country.

Jill Pfaff's avatar

ICE needs to be disbanded and the then-former agents sent to alligator 🐊 Alcatraz for life!

John Michael's avatar

Let’s not put the poor indigenous people that got that place closed through that again please!

Charlie's avatar

The 12 states: Beyond California, states joining Monday’s lawsuit include Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Washington.

I wonder why the other Dem trifecta states didn't join? (There may be a solid legal reason.)

Vickie Glastetter's avatar

Thanks Charlie! You saved me doing a search and I'm very pleased to see my state if Wasington on the list.

Charlie's avatar

You're welcome! I an not pleased to see Virginia is not on it 😖

Mary Evelyn Conner's avatar

Ummmm…North Carolina’s AG Jeff Jackson has also filed lawsuits to stop this. So, those aren’t the only states. Perhaps, those are the members of the class action lawsuit. Many states, like NC, have filed separate lawsuits to block this merger.

Sandra Novelly's avatar

Drumpf is like a cornered beast who uses every possible tooth, claw, tail, or other part to avoid being captured and being made to face the consequences of its actions. He knows the walls are closing in. As for ICE, I have nothing but the deepest contempt...

Bonnie's avatar

We are well beyond enough is enough.

Julia's avatar

Trump and those destroying this country have convinced themselves they are entitled to have whatever they want. Not true. They will learn that when they wind up in prison.

Vikki's avatar

He had a strategy? 🤣 Methinks it's the people pulling the puppet strings. Let's not give the orange menace any credit. Ever.

T Lehew's avatar

Why am I unable to share these posts on Facebook? This just began recently.

Charlie's avatar

Perhaps because FB is a facist-controlled platform?

John Michael's avatar

Stay off Facebook with anything against this government unless you intend to be harassed.

Arthur Sanders's avatar

The question to ask in the Senate for every nominee: Did Joe Biden win the 2020 election? Unless the answer is a clear Yes!, just reject the person at once.

George Lesniewski's avatar

Air tags have GPS tracking capabilities, anyone on a plane can be tracked, reporters should strip down before entering Air Force One or any plane pretending to be one!

John Michael's avatar

Any reporter going aboard AF1 is taking their life in their hands. Not noble, stupid!

GG Haegelin's avatar

Cuckoo doodle do

pat archer's avatar

This is a disgusting story….

Susan Kelly's avatar

This would be the ideal time for a follow up interview on how Republicans and Musk stole the 2024 election.

Dr. Linda Hackett's avatar

Todd Blanche is due to be appointed Attorney General while multiple federal judges are issuing findings of misconduct against him, then the United States is walking directly into a constitutional crisis of credibility. You now have a man who a federal judge has accused of engineering a “settlement” that was actually a scheme to manipulate the judicial process and funnel billions in taxpayer money to his client - and that same man is about to become the nation’s top law enforcement officer. That is not a conflict of interest; it is a collision. The Attorney General is supposed to be the guardian of legal integrity, yet Blanche is entering the role under the shadow of a fifty‑six‑page judicial opinion detailing how he bent the legal system for political ends. It is unprecedented for someone facing this level of judicial rebuke to be elevated to the highest legal office in the country.

At the same time, Blanche is being told by another federal judge that he has effectively conceded he is violating federal law by refusing to release the Epstein Files. Attorneys normally fight, appeal, or argue technicalities - they do not concede illegality in open court. For an incoming Attorney General, this is catastrophic. It signals a man who is already at odds with the judiciary he is meant to oversee. The courts are not whispering their concerns; they are documenting them, issuing formal opinions, and sending misconduct findings directly to the New York bar, where Blanche is already facing disciplinary proceedings. The optics alone are staggering: an Attorney General entering office under active judicial scrutiny for misconduct and potential violations of federal law.

Taken together, this paints a picture of a legal system being asked to accept leadership from someone it is simultaneously investigating. It is not simply controversial - it undermines the foundational expectation that the Attorney General must be above reproach. Blanche’s elevation in the midst of cascading judicial criticism suggests a deeper structural problem: a government willing to place political loyalty above legal integrity, even when the courts themselves are raising alarms. If these findings are accurate, then Wednesday is not just an appointment; it is a test of whether the rule of law can withstand being overseen by someone already accused of breaking it.